Re: Blues Offseason Trades/Signings Thread
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2020 11:40 pm
Torey Krug probably getting restless.
Start the parade!
Man, if Vegas changes direction, then he really messed up.
Sounds like he wanted to come back and he had a reasonable offer. Army said he included a partial NMC and some bonus money. If I'm Petro and what i really wanted was to stay, I'm pissed at myself and especially agent.
Sounds like he wanted to come back and he had a reasonable offer. Army said he included a partial NMC and some bonus money. If I'm Petro and what i really wanted was to stay, I'm pissed at myself and especially my agent.
Petro's agents expected Army to offer a blank contract & say "fill it in as you see fit" apparently....Dave's a mess wrote: Sat Oct 10, 2020 10:48 amSounds like he wanted to come back and he had a reasonable offer. Army said he included a partial NMC and some bonus money. If I'm Petro and what i really wanted was to stay, I'm pissed at myself and especially my agent.
Yeah, that's a fine starting point for negotiations back in January of 2019, but in the homestretch building up to UFA day during a flat cap pandemic? Probably not, unless those things were more important than staying in St. Louis. If they were, then by all means Petro's camp was right to hold their ground. If staying in St. Louis was a high priority he and his reps had to know that wasn't going to happen. It sounds like Army was willing to give some concessions, but not everything. We'll probably never know, and we'll never really know what Petro's true priorities were. Either he let his agents overplay their hand, or he just wanted more money.usmcaaron wrote: Sat Oct 10, 2020 10:57 amPetro's agents expected Army to offer a blank contract & say "fill it in as you see fit" apparently....Dave's a mess wrote: Sat Oct 10, 2020 10:48 amSounds like he wanted to come back and he had a reasonable offer. Army said he included a partial NMC and some bonus money. If I'm Petro and what i really wanted was to stay, I'm pissed at myself and especially my agent.
Screenshot_20201010-102720_Samsung Internet.jpg
Army can't just "cave" on whatever he wants. Not in the current financial climate. If Petro wants to stay, it's gotta be give & take from both sides.
Source: The Score, Day One Winners and Losers article.The addition of Justin Faulk last year was a head-scratcher from the get-go and was always going to be a problem for the Blues. The seven-year, $45.5-million extension GM Doug Armstrong gave him likely spelled the end of Alex Pietrangelo in St. Louis. Along with Colton Parayko, it didn’t make sense to pay top dollar for three right-handed defensemen. But Armstrong helped rectify his own issue Friday.
Instead of waiting to see if Pietrangelo would return on a deal that slightly handcuffs the team, Armstrong went out and got the next best rearguard on the open market, signing Torey Krug to a seven-year contract with a $6.5-million cap hit. If Armstrong waited on Pietrangelo, he still might've lost his captain and saw Krug go elsewhere. It was smart to strike a deal while he could.
Now, by no means are we saying Krug is better than Pietrangelo - because he's certainly not - but the latter likely would have cost a couple million more per season. And, the fact Krug is left-handed evens out the potential pairings:
LD RD
Torey Krug Justin Faulk
Vince Dunn Colton Parayko
Marco Scandella Robert Bortuzzo
Carl Gunnarsson
That’s still an awfully strong blue line, even without Pietrangelo. Don’t be surprised if Faulk has a bounce-back year now that he doesn’t have to play his off side. He and Krug have played together before on the international stage, too.
He’s lucky Deboer is the coach there. He’s all about D. So it might just happen. If Petro wanted it all his way with the Blues, I’m sure he’ll back off that with Vegas.Dread_Pirate_Westley wrote: Sat Oct 10, 2020 11:33 am JRs wording kind of sucks. He's heading there for a visit with the team, not specifically saying he's 100% signing there.
He had just 3 points in his 20 games prior to the shutdown. But yes, here's hoping some comfort next year will do him some good. It would be huge if so.insideout wrote: Sat Oct 10, 2020 2:22 pm I feel like I'm in the minority, but I thought Faulk had improved quite a bit throughout the 19/20 season and was playing fairly well when they shut things down. I'm not convinced he is the disaster a lot of people think he is. Krug/Faulk pairing sounds okay to me. The Tarasenko situation is a bigger problem.
ThanksBluesSK wrote: Sat Oct 10, 2020 12:57 pmSource: The Score, Day One Winners and Losers article.The addition of Justin Faulk last year was a head-scratcher from the get-go and was always going to be a problem for the Blues. The seven-year, $45.5-million extension GM Doug Armstrong gave him likely spelled the end of Alex Pietrangelo in St. Louis. Along with Colton Parayko, it didn’t make sense to pay top dollar for three right-handed defensemen. But Armstrong helped rectify his own issue Friday.
Instead of waiting to see if Pietrangelo would return on a deal that slightly handcuffs the team, Armstrong went out and got the next best rearguard on the open market, signing Torey Krug to a seven-year contract with a $6.5-million cap hit. If Armstrong waited on Pietrangelo, he still might've lost his captain and saw Krug go elsewhere. It was smart to strike a deal while he could.
Now, by no means are we saying Krug is better than Pietrangelo - because he's certainly not - but the latter likely would have cost a couple million more per season. And, the fact Krug is left-handed evens out the potential pairings:
LD RD
Torey Krug Justin Faulk
Vince Dunn Colton Parayko
Marco Scandella Robert Bortuzzo
Carl Gunnarsson
That’s still an awfully strong blue line, even without Pietrangelo. Don’t be surprised if Faulk has a bounce-back year now that he doesn’t have to play his off side. He and Krug have played together before on the international stage, too.
I think so. Schenn, Tarasenko (when healthy), Parayko, DP 57, and Faulk will probably be the A's