shpongle falls wrote:I'm kinda torn on the Oshie trade because I remember the offseason Oshie was traded, I was ok with it because despite being a good player he was just a complete non-factor in the playoffs since he's been with the Blues. Having said that Brouwer and Copley seemed like a super underwhelming trade value for a player like Oshie. But then Brouwer had a monster playoff performance for us so I was good with the trade.
emphasis mine, but yes. this. all of this. and he was way too far in his own head here. despite the meager return, this was what you call a good ol' hockey trade - both players needed a change, and both players/teams were better for it.
to say this:
NHLTIM wrote:Huge mistake by Army...worst move he's made by far.
is pretty ridiculous. really?
this is the worst move he's made? hitchcock extension/double coaches, lehtera, ryan miller... the list goes on. seems to me everyone was talking about the culture in the locker room, and that our "core guys" were a) not getting it done in the playoffs, b) had tuned out the coach, and c) were a negative influence in the room based on their entitlement. we needed to shake that up, and trading someone that had been marketed as the face of the blues was certainly a way to do that. my preference would have been to start with backes, but oshie was #2 on my list. would have moved them all if possible. yes, every return we got for the trade is gone, but as shpongle said, we now have money to sign other key players, so we are still a better team for this trade.