UMSLBlues12 wrote:Parayko article from THN:
http://www.thehockeynews.com/news/artic ... very-penny
What would everyone be comfortable giving Parayko on an 8 year deal, if we try and max out the term like this article suggests? I think 6M would be around the highest I'd like to go. Petro's deal, at 6.5M per, was signed after he had 118 points in 207 games in the previous 3 "full" seasons (one lockout shortened). Parayko has two seasons with 68 points in 160 games. Points aren't everything, but that combined with the fact that Parayko won't have a top-pair role essentially as long as Petro is here makes me think the Blues won't go higher than Petro's deal, but cap increases and such since then make me think it will be close.
If Parayko goes for an 8 year deal, I'm fine if it's between a $5.0M - $6.0M cap hit. That to me indicates give and take on both sides. The Blues get him locked up for 8 years at a reasonable price and Parayko gets a nice payday before completely showing that he is a consistent NHL top tier defenseman.
If he goes for a bridge deal, it would probably be 3 years at $4M - $5M cap hit. But then, if he progresses like we all hope he will, he will cost at least $7M a season. I think an 8 year deal between $5M and $6M AAV would the best of both worlds.
Again, this kind of thing right here is why I'm glad I'm not a GM. I love to criticize from a distance using hindsight. That's much easier.