It has serious botch potential. Nice job by Schwartz on the conversion.
You know in looking at it again, Schenn made the right choice going Petro first. If he had dropped it back to Schwartz instead then that would have been a botched up break away.insideout wrote: Tue Nov 05, 2019 11:43 pm Goalie played that about as well as he could have. I"m glad Schwartz was in sniper mode instead of looking for the easy tap-in.
I had the same thought. Honestly, not as easy a play as it might seem.BillP. wrote: Tue Nov 05, 2019 11:47 pmYou know in looking at it again, Schenn made the right choice going Petro first. If he had dropped it back to Schwartz instead then that would have been a botched up break away.insideout wrote: Tue Nov 05, 2019 11:43 pm Goalie played that about as well as he could have. I"m glad Schwartz was in sniper mode instead of looking for the easy tap-in.
Glad got to see that, what a crazy sequence.
I can't remember ever seeing a 3 on 0 in a 5 on 5, 4 on 4, 5 on 4, 6 on 5, or even 6 on 4. Maybe this is the first time it's ever happened other than in a kids' pond hockey game. I don't even ever remember that having happened on our backyard rink!
it's all the ch.Dread_Pirate_Westley wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2019 5:19 am The Blues have gone to overtime in every game since the overtime thread was started.
T.C. wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2019 6:11 amit's all the ch.Dread_Pirate_Westley wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2019 5:19 am The Blues have gone to overtime in every game since the overtime thread was started.
It's a digraph, dude. Don't they teach Phonics in school no more?!MattyIce wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2019 7:36 amT.C. wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2019 6:11 amit's all the ch.Dread_Pirate_Westley wrote: Wed Nov 06, 2019 5:19 amThe Blues have gone to overtime in every game since the overtime thread was started.
Was it ever established what the ch was?
